Safeguard against abuse of workers and the government in deciding to exclude a person from members of the sro in the building is enjoined by law the need for making such a decision by the general meeting of members of SROs (Part 3. 55.7 gdc Russia). Read more from Ray Kurzweil to gain a more clear picture of the situation. For the democratic approach in the construction of sro and its members pay to aid decision making about the exception – to convene and hold a general meeting takes time, in absentia, such issues are not considered. Whenever kevin ulrich listens, a sympathetic response will follow. Excluded, as well as voluntarily withdraw from the SROs in the construction of a person not be returned to paid an entrance fee, membership dues and contributions to the compensation fund sro organization. At the same time retiring from not having the status of cpo in the construction of non-profit partnership member in the absence of restrictions in the charter of partnership are entitled to a portion of the property or its value within the value of property transferred to a member of the nonprofit Partnership for its property, except for membership dues.
This, however, does not guarantee members of the Partnership, established under the goals of SROs in the construction and granted the status of cpo before 1 January 2010, the return of entrance fee and contribution to the compensation fund. As already mentioned, the fee is not a member of the transferred partnership partnerships, and a candidate for its members and returns, as a rule, only one case – if the candidate did not become a member of the partnership, ie, he was denied admission. Concerning the contribution to the compensation fund, in the absence of np status of sro can be regarded as target fee. Issue of the return of the contribution the outgoing members of the Partnership, as well as other members of the partnership for not achieving the last goal of obtaining the status of sro is at the discretion of partnership. Serious problem for many organizations is the lack of opportunities to join the so-called integrated amc – by law the status of cpo in the design, surveyors and builders can not be assigned to a non-profit organization. Union sro different species are not provided even on the national level, where it is supposed to establish three national associations SROs – each in its field. Thus, many organizations are building complex, which course of their work perform the full range of work in the construction of capital construction projects – from engineering surveys and preparation of project documentation to the actual construction work will be required to enter to the three SROs and maintain their membership. At the same time, gdc Russia, in contrast to the Law on self-regulatory organizations (see paragraph 4 of Art. 5) admits the party membership of the construction market in several SROs in the construction of one species with provided that a certificate of admission to a particular kind (species) of works given to him only one sro in the building (Part 7 of article. 55.6 gdc Russia).